À QUI S’ADRESSE CETTE FORMATION ?
- For individuals responsible for conducting third-party assessments regarding integrity risks, or any employee involved in this evaluation process.
- Members of procurement, sales, business development or public affairs departments
Training is limited to 15 participants – minimum 8 registrations
And 20 participants for remote sessions
To find out about upcoming session dates and locations, please email us : contact@proetic.fr
Would you like to arrange this training at your company? Contact us : contact@proetic.fr
Would you like a customized proposal? Please email us : contact@proetic.fr
PREREQUISITES
No prerequisites required
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
The program enables participants to:
- Understand the challenges of corruption worldwide
- Know the regulatory requirements regarding third-party assessments
- Know the open sources available to assess a third party’s integrity
- Know how to conduct a third-party integrity assessment, evaluate risk levels using available sources.
- Know the possible due diligence measures after the assessment and their limitations
- Understand one’s role in corruption prevention
FORMAT
In-person
3 hours
We can adapt the format depending on the level of detail required for each section of the program.
En distanciel
(interactive videoconference)
3 hours
Remote format, made interactive through the use of polls, mini-quizzes, videos and group work in virtual breakout rooms to encourage teamwork and the sharing of experiences and best practices.
TEACHING APPROACH
A blend of theory, practical demonstrations and hands-on exercises through individual and group exercises. Exercises, videos, case studies and practical scenarios enrich this training.
Educational resources :
- Theoretical materials
- Practical case studies
- Review of real cases where third-party assessment would have detected and prevented a risky situation
- “Key takeaways” summary provided at the end of the training
“The training allowed us to share best practices and rethink the distribution of roles across our entire procedure. We also began reflecting on broadening the risks covered by our approach, thanks to the contextualization of different risks.”
